Jump to content


[TUTORIAL] O que é o formato "RAW"

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic




  • Colaborador
  • 10,328 posts

Posted 10 de May de 2006 - 10:27


The RAW file format is digital photography's equivalent of a negative in film photography: it contains untouched, "raw" pixel information straight from the digital camera's sensor. The RAW file format has yet to undergo demosaicing, and so it contains just one red, green, or blue value at each pixel location. Digital cameras normally "develop" this RAW file by converting it into a full color JPEG or TIFF image file, and then store the RAW file in your memory card. Digital cameras have to make several interpretive decisions when they develop a RAW file, and so the RAW file format offers you more control over how the final JPEG or TIFF image is generated. This section aims to illustrate the technical advantages of RAW files, and makes suggestions about when to use the RAW file format.


A RAW file is developed into a final JPEG or TIFF image in several steps, each of which may contain several irreversible image adjustments. One key advantage of RAW is that it allows the photographer to postpone applying these adjustments-- giving more flexibility to the photographer to later apply these themselves, in a way which best suits each image. The following diagram illustrates the sequence of adjustments:

(RAW IMAGE) -> Posted Image ->*Posted Image->**Posted Image->***Posted Image ****

*- Demosaicing White Balance
**- Tone Curves, Contrast, Color Saturation, Sharpening
***- Conversion to 8-bit JPEG compression
****- JPEG/TIFF recorded to memory card

Demoisaicing and white balance involve interpreting and converting the bayer array into an image with all three colors at each pixel, and occur in the same step. The bayer array is what makes the first image appear more pixelated than the other two, and gives the image a greenish tint.

Our eyes perceive differences in lightness logarithmically, and so when light intensity quadruples we only perceive this as a doubling in the amount of light. A digital camera, on the other hand, records differences in lightness linearly-- twice the light intensity produces twice the response in the camera sensor. This is why the first and second images above look so much darker than the third. In order for the numbers recorded within a digital camera to be shown as we perceive them, tone curves need to be applied.

Color saturation and contrast may also be adjusted, depending on the setting within your camera. The image is then sharpened to offset the softening caused by demosaicing, which is visible in the second image.

The high bit depth RAW image is then converted into 8-bits per channel, and compressed into a JPEG based on the compression setting within your camera. Up until this step, RAW image information most likely resided within the digital camera's memory buffer.

There are several advantages to performing any of the above RAW conversion steps afterwards on a personal computer, as opposed to within a digital camera. The next sections describe how using RAW files can enhance these RAW conversion steps.


Demosaicing is a very processor-intensive step, and so the best demosaicing algorithms require more processing power than is practical within today's digital cameras. Most digital cameras therefore take quality-compromising shortcuts to convert a RAW file into a TIFF or JPEG in a reasonable amount of time. Performing the demosaicing step on a personal computer allows for the best algorithms since a PC has many times more processing power than a typical digital camera. Better algorithms can squeeze a little more out of your camera sensor by producing more resolution, less noise, better small-scale color accuracy and reduced moiré. Note the resolution advantage shown below:

Posted Image
JPEG (in-camera)

Posted Image

Posted Image

(Images from actual camera tests with a Canon EOS 20D using an ISO 12233 resolution test chart.
Differential between RAW and JPEG resolution may vary camera model and conversion software.)

The in-camera JPEG image is not able to resolve lines as closely spaced as those in the RAW image. Even so, a RAW file cannot achieve the ideal lines shown, because the process of demosaicing always introduces some softening to the image. Only sensors which capture all three colors at each pixel location could achieve the ideal image shown at the bottom (such as Foveon-type sensors).


White balance is the process of removing unrealistic color casts, so that objects which appear white in person are rendered white in your photo. Color casts within JPEG images can often be removed in post-processing, but at the cost of bit depth and color gamut. This is because the white balance has effectively been set twice: once in RAW conversion and then again in post-processing. RAW files give you the ability to set the white balance of a photo *after* the picture has been taken-- without unnecessarily destroying bits.


Digital cameras actually record each color channel with more precision than the 8-bits (256 levels) per channel used for JPEG images (see "Understanding Bit Depth"). Most current cameras capture each color with 12-bits of precision (212 = 4096 levels) per color channel, providing several times more levels than could be achieved by using an in-camera JPEG. Higher bit depth decreases the susceptibility to posterization, and increases your flexibility when choosing a color space and in post-processing.


The RAW file format usually provides considerably more "dynamic range" than a JPEG file, depending on how the camera creates its JPEG. Dynamic range refers to the range of light to dark which can be captured by a camera before becoming completely white or black, respectively. Since the raw color data has not been converted into logarithmic values using curves (see overview), the exposure of a RAW file can be adjusted slightly-- after the photo has been taken. Exposure compensation can correct for metering errors, or can help bring out lost shadow or highlight detail.


Since a RAW file is untouched, sharpening has not been applied within the camera. Much like demosaicing, better sharpening algorithms are often far more processor intensive. Sharpening performed on a personal computer can thus create fewer halo artifacts for an equivalent amount of sharpening (see "Sharpening Using an Unsharp Mask" for examples of sharpening artifacts).

Since sharpness depends on the intended viewing distance of your image, the RAW file format also provides more control over what type and how much sharpening is applied (given your purpose). Sharpening is usually the last post-processing step since it cannot be undone, so having a pre-sharpened JPEG is not optimal.


The RAW file format uses a lossless compression, and so it does not suffer from the compression artifacts visible with "lossy" JPEG compression. RAW files contain more information and achieve better compression than TIFF, but without the compression artifacts of JPEG.

Note: Kodak and Nikon employ a slightly lossy RAW compression algorithm, although any artifacts are much lower than would be perceived with a similar JPEG image. The efficiency of RAW compression also varies with digital camera manufacturer.


* RAW files are much larger than similar JPEG files, and so fewer photos can fit within the same memory card.
* RAW files are more time consuming since they may require manually applying each conversion step.
* RAW files often take longer to be written to a memory card since they are larger, therefore most digital cameras may not achieve the same frame rate as with JPEG.
* RAW files cannot be given to others immediately since they require specific software to load them, therefore it may be necessary to first convert them into JPEG.
* RAW files require a more powerful computer with more temporary memory (RAM).


One problem with the RAW file format is that it is not very standardized. Each camera has their own proprietary RAW file format, and so one program may not be able to read all formats. Fortunately, Adobe has announced a digital negative (DNG) specification which aims to standardize the RAW file format. In addition, any camera which has the ability to save RAW files should come with its own software to read them.

Good RAW conversion software can perform batch processes and often automates all conversion steps except those which you choose to modify. This can mitigate or even eliminate the ease of use advantage of JPEG files.

Many newer cameras can save both RAW and JPEG images simultaneously. This provides you with an immediate final image, but retains the RAW "negative" just in case more flexibility is desired later.


So which is better: RAW or JPEG? There is no single answer, as this depends on the type of photography you are doing. In most cases, RAW files will provide the best solution due to their technical advantages and the decreasing cost of large memory cards. RAW files give the photographer far more control, but with this comes the trade-off of speed, storage space and ease of use. The RAW trade-off is sometimes not worth it for sports and press photographers, although landscape and most fine art photographers often choose RAW in order to maximize the image quality potential of their digital camera.

Fonte: Cambridge Colour

#2 Bandeirante

  • Usuários
  • 1,898 posts

Posted 22 de January de 2007 - 10:53

Retirado de http://pcworld.uol.com.br/

Acredite ou não, o RAW não é um formato único. Cada fabricante de câmeras digitais tem o seu próprio formato nativo e, coletivamente, estas formatos são conhecidos como RAW. O RAW da Canon, por exemplo, usa as extensões .crw e .cr2, enquanto o da Nikon cria arquivos.nef. Os formatos RAW são todos únicos e proprietários, portanto são incompatíveis entre eles.

No entanto, não importa que sabor de RAW você use, a idéia envolvendo todos é a mesma. Os arquivos RAW são representações cristalinas e não comprimidas do que é capturado pelos sensores da câmera quando você pressiona o disparador. São imagens totalmente não processadas.

No caso dos arquivos JPEG, a câmera executa um conjunto de rotinas eletrônicas como ajustes de nitidez, do balanço de branco e correções de cor. Provavelmente, o ponto mais importante é que o RAW preserva todas as cores como originalmente capturadas, usualmente 12 bits por pixel. Quando uma foto é gravada em JPEG, a câmera reduz o número total de cores para 8 bit por pixel. Resumindo, se você editar suas imagens depois, a fidelidade do RAW resultará em melhores fotografias.


Os aspectos negativos do RAW

RAW NR - 200x500Ainda há, porém, algumas desvantagens em trabalhar com o RAW. A primeira delas é que leva mais tempo para sua câmera salvar as imagens. A maioria dos aparelhos modernos grava arquivos JPEG, mesmo os maiores, quase ao mesmo tempo do disparo. Mas os arquivos RAW são outra história.Na minha Nikon de 6 megapixels, por exemplo, cada imagem demora cerca de 40 segundos para ser salva no cartão de memória. Isso significa 2 minuto e meio para esvaziar o buffer de quatro imagens da câmera no cartão, o equivalente a 14 eternidades para quem está fotografando.

O tamanho dos arquivos é outra coisa a se levar em consideração. Meus arquivos JPEG de melhor qualidade ficam em torno de 2.5 MB, enquanto seus equivalentes em RAW ocupam 4.5 MB. Isso pode não ser um problema pois já há muitos cartões de memória de 1 GB no mercado, mas, se você tem pouco espaço, certamente sentirá a diferença.


Software compatível com RAW

No passado, a maioria dos softwares de edição de imagens não trabalhava com os formatos RAW, mas, felizmente, isso mudou. Todos os meus programas favoritos agora trabalham com imagens RAW praticamente como se fosse JPGs. Os mais populares softwares comerciais do gênero - Adobe Photoshop Elements, Microsoft Digital Image Suite, Corel Paint Shop Pro ou Ulead PhotoImpact - oferecem suporte a RAW em suas últimas versões.

Porém, o Microsoft Windows XP não conhece absolutamente nada sobre arquivos RAW. Nas suas pastas, imagens RAW aparecerão com ícones sem identificação ou descrição alguma e não haverá previews ou miniaturas das fotos. Clicar duas vezes sobre o arquivo, portanto, não produzirá efeito algum. Mas a Microsoft se moveu rápido e há uma solução: o utilitário gratuito RAW Image Thumbnailer and Viewer, que torna as imagens RAW equivalentes a qualquer outro formato de imagem reconhecido pelo Windows.